Subject: | Re: [OM] ***SPAM*** Re: Exposure compensation dial MOOSE |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:47:56 -0400 |
If that was the case being discussed I missed it. But in any case I
would call that "allocated" not "dedicated".
Chuck Norcutt On 9/25/2014 11:16 AM, ChrisB wrote: Not necessarily, Chuck. You could describe as “dedicated” a switch or dial that the user had decided to dedicate to a single use. Just because it is dedicated to a use now does not mean that it has to be so in an hour’s time. Chris On 25 Sep 2014, at 14:14, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Your English is superb, Phillipe, but in this case I suggest you refer to a dictionary for the definition of "dedicated". The notion of opting out does not fit. The aperture ring on an OM MF lens is dedicated to changing the aperture. Because it is dedicated to that task there is no way of causing it to do something else. Chuck Norcutt -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Typhoon, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Typhoon, Ian Nichols |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] ***SPAM*** Re: Exposure compensation dial MOOSE, ChrisB |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ***SPAM*** Re: Exposure compensation dial MOOSE, Philippe |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |