I probably have smaller hands than you do, Ian. But I do like holding the
X-Pro1 (and the X100S) as well.
Chris
On 21 Sep 2014, at 20:19, SwissPace <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I agree with you Chris about the size, however it didn't work for me without
> adding a grip unlike the X-Pro1 which felt right from the start.
>
>
> On 21/09/14 20:14, ChrisB wrote:
>> I don’t wish to seem obsessive about this size thing, Brian, but according
>> to camerasize.com the Fuji X-T1 is 129 x 89 x 47mm, while the OM4Ti is 139 x
>> 87 x 50mm (the last dimension is the depth front to back). The comparison
>> is pretty close to what I have until now only estimated.
>>
>> The shape of the Fuji looked a bit odd to me, but it felt just right once I
>> had it in my hands.
>>
>> The histogram is not in the EVF for the portrait orientation, by the way
>> (unless you switch off portrait orientation of the EVF display) and it goes
>> away while the shutter is half-pressed.
>>
>> Chris
>> On 21 Sep 2014, at 14:48, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>
>>> I had it in my
>>> hands for no more than about 3 minutes and of course we were talking the
>>> whole time so i didn't have too much time for reflection. However, my
>>> first impressions were; large body. Body and lens were amazingly light.
>>> The Electronic viewfinder was much too dim for my liking. Lens was trim
>>> and slim and very smooth to use. EVF had a small live histogram running
>>> the whole time, in the bottom RHS; not intrusive.
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|