I don’t wish to seem obsessive about this size thing, Brian, but according to
camerasize.com the Fuji X-T1 is 129 x 89 x 47mm, while the OM4Ti is 139 x 87 x
50mm (the last dimension is the depth front to back). The comparison is pretty
close to what I have until now only estimated.
The shape of the Fuji looked a bit odd to me, but it felt just right once I had
it in my hands.
The histogram is not in the EVF for the portrait orientation, by the way
(unless you switch off portrait orientation of the EVF display) and it goes
away while the shutter is half-pressed.
Chris
On 21 Sep 2014, at 14:48, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I had it in my
> hands for no more than about 3 minutes and of course we were talking the
> whole time so i didn't have too much time for reflection. However, my
> first impressions were; large body. Body and lens were amazingly light.
> The Electronic viewfinder was much too dim for my liking. Lens was trim
> and slim and very smooth to use. EVF had a small live histogram running
> the whole time, in the bottom RHS; not intrusive.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|