Oh, sure. Bring physics and logic into the argument.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Chuck Norcutt <
chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> A 150mm f/2.8 lens must have a front element that has a minimum clear
> aperture of 53.6mm. Then it will need about a dozen other elements many of
> which will be of similar size. Lots of glass weight no matter how light
> the housing.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>
> On 9/15/2014 7:49 AM, Paul Braun wrote:
>
>> Just got an email from Olympus that they're accepting pre-orders on the
>> 40-150/2.8 Monster Lens for delivery in mid-November....
>>
>> It's $1500, about what everyone was guessing. However, as my experiments
>> are showing me, it can't be 10x better than the smaller 40-150 that I went
>> with. Description says it weighs "less than 2lbs" which still seems pretty
>> heavy for a MFT lens.
>>
>>
>> Paul Braun
>> Certified Music Junkie
>>
>> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life.". -- Berthold
>> Auerbach
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
Paul Braun
Certified Music Junkie
"Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold Auerbach
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|