And note that there is another option. Right now (IIRC) you are using
panorama software not to make a panorama but to stack the two images.
You could also use the panorama software to make each of the stacked
images a true panorama.
If you overlap the two halves of the pano by 1/3 their width that would
give you an image that's approximately 6078 pixels wide. That would
allow prints up to 24" wide at 250ppi with no interpolation. Almost all
of my landscapes these days are panoramas of 2-3 images or more. One can
make panoramas in the vertical direction as well but that's rather rare
for me.
Chuck Norcutt
On 8/3/2014 9:17 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
Then I would also suggest that you try making one by resizing up to
250ppi and let the software handle interpolation. See which one is better.
Chuck Norcutt
On 8/3/2014 6:56 AM, bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Chuck wrote;
Congratulations on having accomplished your goal. But
I don't understand why you chose a maximum image height of 1165 pixels
to fit a 6" high space. That's only 194 pixels per inch which is a
rather low resolution for a print. I would suggest 250 ppi for a largish
print like this and even higher for a smaller print.
Chuck Nrocutt
////////////////////////////
1165 pixels is about half the short axis
pixel size of my E-3 Large Fine image dimension.
I reasoned that if I
am to maintain the correct proportions, and the long axis is 3648
pixels, that's what it needs to be.
I've sent the order off, so we
shall see. this week.
Sent to http://www.photo.co.nz
http://www.photo.co.nz/webprints/webprints_intro.htm
Brian
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|