Re: [OM] Curious

[Chuck Norcutt]

Not if you had a proper adapter for 4/3 to whatever *mirrorless* body 
you're using.
Chuck Norcutt


On 7/9/2014 11:12 AM, Iwert Bernakiewicz wrote:
> Wouldn't the biggest problem be infinity focus in stead of extreme macro?
> (at least for the m4/3 lenses)
>
> Iwert
>
>
> 2014-07-09 16:44 GMT+02:00 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Ken beat me to it.  Yes, what you described is exactly the function of a
> > teleconverter and he chose 2X because that's the minimum magnification that
> > would be required to go from 4/3 to full frame.
> >
> > You would need a 4/3 TC attached to the 4/3 lens.  Your most pressing
> > problem would be to find a 4/3 adapter to the full-frame camera.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/9/2014 10:02 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
> >
> > >   From a physics standpoint,  would it be possible that a device like a
> > > > Metabones could be constructed to cover a "full frame" sensor with an
> > > > existing 4/3 or M43 lens?  Or, at least, cover a larger 4/3 sensor that
> > > > would be equivalent to "full frame" ?
> > > Yes. That would be a 2X teleconverter with wide-field coverage.
> > >
> > >   --
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> > Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> > Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/