Wouldn't the biggest problem be infinity focus in stead of extreme macro?
(at least for the m4/3 lenses)
Iwert
2014-07-09 16:44 GMT+02:00 Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Ken beat me to it. Yes, what you described is exactly the function of a
> teleconverter and he chose 2X because that's the minimum magnification that
> would be required to go from 4/3 to full frame.
>
> You would need a 4/3 TC attached to the 4/3 lens. Your most pressing
> problem would be to find a 4/3 adapter to the full-frame camera.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
>
> On 7/9/2014 10:02 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>
>> From a physics standpoint, would it be possible that a device like a
>>> Metabones could be constructed to cover a "full frame" sensor with an
>>> existing 4/3 or M43 lens? Or, at least, cover a larger 4/3 sensor that
>>> would be equivalent to "full frame" ?
>>>
>>
>> Yes. That would be a 2X teleconverter with wide-field coverage.
>>
>> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|