Subject: | Re: [OM] The Adobe tax |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:25:55 -0400 |
All of that internal stuff means nothing to me. If both make good
images I don't care how they got there. But I do care very much about
where the buttons and dial are and how they fall to hand.
Chuck Norcutt On 7/8/2014 12:39 PM, Ken Norton wrote: With the UI and sensor out of the picture I'm having a tough time understanding "shared stuff going on". Can you name a couple of things to help me out? Switches, dials, EVF or something else?Image processing chain. Autofocus, internal fab work, etc. Actually, the sensor is more shared than you'd think. I believe the pipeline is the same. Along with that, there is a lot of internal cross-licensing of stuff that actually matters. Both companies are benefiting. Not sure where Panasonic stands in all this. The general form-factor of the A7 has the appearance of being vastly different than the E-M1, the dimensions are nearly identical. If it wasn't for the fact that an OM adapter already exists, it would just take a mount change and a little bit of firmware work to reassign some buttons and switches and you've got yourself an OM-7Mg. Anyway, I've said too much. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] T32 for Macro--question, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Chuck's selfie... was: The Adobe Tax - Chuck ;-), Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] The Adobe tax, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] The Adobe tax, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |