A simple answer for Chris
DNG files take much less HD space than RAW & RAW2 (pana), NEF (nikon), RAF
(fuji), ORF (Oly) - this is my experience over the years, using different
cameras and all the variations of LR.
Quality is identical, access as fast, so why bother?
Hope this helps
Amities
Philippe, whose files will be dumped by his heirs in any case, if not lost by
self beforehand.
Le 3 juil. 2014 à 10:54, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> Can't answer your fundamental question, Chris, but
snip
>
> Chris Barker
> Sent: 03 July 2014 06:01
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: [OM] Converting Raw files
>
> Nathan's question (concerning the size of his Fuji .raf files converted to
> Raw) prompt me to ask, "why bother".
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|