My night for replying to myself continues.
Here's a modest example I posted before showing how masks allow separate adjustment of disparate parts of an image.
<http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Manley/Alms_Bowls.htm>
Alms and the Moose
On 6/27/2014 8:45 PM, Moose wrote:
On 6/27/2014 4:58 PM, ozlangur@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 28 Jun 2014, at 9:49 am, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hence my smiley. I know I am not alone, but in a small minority, among those who find LR, and probably Aperture, and
all the many others that give me just a bunch of sliders and no layers, masks etc. (And, yes, I HATE Nik's control
points and their clones.)
Ah, yes. I should've remembered what you've said in the past about the sliders and Nik's control points. I like them,
but it is not a relative thing.
I don't dislike sliders, per se. I dislike having ONLY sliders that affect the whole, or at best some nebulously
defined portion of it, with the effects spilling over outside the area I want to modify.
Which is to say I've never used masks & layers sufficiently to make knowledgeable comparison. But that's also why I
suspect I'll go the LR/PS bundle. I liked a demo of PS5 years ago. I wonder if it's changed much. :)
The basic way of operation is the same. They have added or added to several
tools that make it much more powerful.
Masked Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|