On 6/17/2014 11:48 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
That's actually a significant point - we still haven't got used to digital and
so we want our cameras to look like film cameras and our output to look like
film. The things that you can do with digital are bloody amazing and I suspect
that we will only slowly fully explore its potential.
Since I've beaten AG up over this kind of use of 'we', I must protest here,
too, to be fair.
I'm used to digital. I love it.
I want my camera to be easy to hold and use, whether it looks like a film camera or not. It seems to me that the MILCs
are mostly the shape and layout they are as a result of the necessary elements, not an effort to mimic film cameras.
Like Chuck, I have no interest in my digital images looking like some film or other. In fact, when scanning, I tend to
use ICC color profiles to minimize the difference between films.
I'm not arguing that I am right and you are wrong, only that all the 'we' stuff isn't about my part of 'we'. It's about
Andrew, and whoever else is a part of 'you'.
Persnickety Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|