No it doesn't. Apple is a hardware company, MS is a software company - so it's
a comparison of apples and bananas.
Apple has a poor penetration in computes because they cost more - slaves who do
just one thing all day can use cheap s**tboxes and that's what they get. The
school where I work occasionally has had a huge increase in teachers demanding
that their new leased laptop be an Apple (as they can due to a government
policy anomaly), despite the Department and School trying very hard to dissuade
them. Not corporate but it suggests that reasonably able employees who have the
choice will often choose…
Phones and tablets are a much higher proportion but that is very volatile of
course.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Author/Publisher:
The SLR Compendium,The TLR Compendium
http://www.soultheft.com/storehouse_photopublish/
On 18/06/2014, at 12:47 AM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> I need only two things. I’m happy as pig in shit. <g>
>
> Which also explains why Apple has near zero penetration in the corporate
> world.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|