That sounds like a constructive approach, Ken, but I maintain that it’s not the
Anglo-Saxon model.
Chris
On 13 May 2014, at 17:34, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I’m not saying that Olympus shouldn’t have changed, but it has to be focused
>> change, based on a realistic business model, not change for change’s sake.
>
> The company I work for is on a two-year cycle for reorganization in
> the engineering side of things. It's actually kinda nice because when
> we screw something up, we know that it will only be this way for a
> couple of years. I was a bit disturbed about it at first, but having
> been through two now, I'm actually quite impressed.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|