On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Pretty. But really shallow DoF? Looks like the tulip in front is soft
> and
> > it's not that far from the one behind it.
>
> 42mm at F5.6.
>
> I took two pictures. This one I had focused on the second flower, the
> other photo I had it focused on the first one. I suppose that the
> other one could be a little better in that it doesn't have anything
> OOF closer in. But either one was sufficient for the purpose. In small
> viewing this one looks better, but large viewing, the other probably
> does.
>
> Side note: The facebeak version was straight out of camera, Eye-Fi
> transferred to my cellphone and uploaded within two minutes of when I
> took the picture. The zone-10 version was from the raw file where I
> managed to keep the reds from clipping and going nooclear. I was
> trying to avoid the wrathage of Moose.
>
> This brings up the age-old argument about OOF items closer than the focal
> plane.
>
I like the effect, Ken. It's a beautiful composition.
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|