Too narrow. Try and go for 'morally offensive', 'ethically objectionable' and
'questionable taste' as well.
Hmmm…I think I have a couple of images like that somewhere.
The Museum of Modern Art in Hobart, Tasmania, has an entire and large room
devoted to explicit images of female, er, naughty bits. That might qualify.
And it might explain why much to everyone's surprise, the Museum has become the
single most popular tourist destination on the island.
It also suggests that if you tick all those boxes, you may not need a grant at
all.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
Author/Publisher:
The SLR Compendium:
revised edition -
http://blur.by/19Hb8or
The TLR Compendium
http://blur.by/1eDpqN7
On 08/04/2014, at 12:26 PM, DZDub wrote:
>> Make it religiously offensive and I would be guaranteed to get a grant.
>>
>
> With the scope in a phrase like "religiously offensive," there would be
> something for everyone, too.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|