I don't know how common linear polarizers are today since circulars have
been almost a requirement for many years. But I assume there are many
old ones on the used market. Maybe we should grab some of them up
before others realize that they might work well on mirrorless cameras.
:-) Unfortunately, my 49mm Zuiko filters are too small and I don't
think I have a 55mm polarizer that I could use with a step-up ring on
the 12-50 m.Zuiko. The 14-150 needs a 58mm and I don't have anything
for that either.
Chuck Norcutt
On 3/3/2014 3:44 PM, Andrew Fildes wrote:
> B+W refers to linear polarisers as 'Top' polarisers. They should be cheaper -
> so I'm most interested in the answer to this one.
> Andrew Fildes
> afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.soultheft.com
>
> Author/Publisher:
> The SLR Compendium:
> revised edition -
> http://blur.by/19Hb8or
> The TLR Compendium
> http://blur.by/1eDpqN7
>
>
>
> On 04/03/2014, at 1:49 AM, Chris Trask wrote:
>
>>
>> Now I underestand. I had seen no photographic difference between
>> linear and circular polirisers, so I dismissed them.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|