See my previous reply about shadow fill. Portraiture involves more than
just having enough light for a basic exposure.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/19/2014 1:08 PM, philippe.amard wrote:
> f10 !!! at 3.5, not to speak of 1.4, no flash was needed here with
> this ISO setting, or am I completely mistaken?
>
> Amities
> Philippe
>
> Le 18 févr. 14 à 23:36, Paul Braun a écrit :
>
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 3:02 PM, philippe.amard
>> <philippe.amard@xxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> If I may intrude in this thread - I'd be curious to see some of the
>>> photographs of anyone on the list for which a flash was essential to
>>> the success of the take - don't mistake me, I just need to learn from
>>> you all.
>>>
>>> Thank you in anticipation
>>>
>>> Amities
>>> Philippe whose experience is rather that flash spoils a shot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> This shot: http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=10836
>>
>> The light in this room was fluorescent overheads and not at all
>> pretty and
>> not really even. I tried it without flash, and looking at it on the
>> screen, it was flat and not pretty. Adding some flash (again with
>> the Fong
>> salad bowl) and I got separation, even exposure, and good colors
>> with a
>> minimum of LR gymnastics.
>>
>> --
>>
>> Paul Braun
>> Certified Music Junkie
>>
>> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Berthold
>> Auerbach
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
> to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
> NO ARCHIVE
>
>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|