The 14-50 is near perfect for its area and format - better than the
18-55 Nathan was referring to and that I also own - Alice and I used
it on the E620 for fun with no issues, just that both have
stabilzation, so you must chose, either one or the other.
The 14-150 was long to come on the market, too long and too late as a
result, plain vanilla 4/3 was already dying.
Yet, I've viewed wonderful takes by Marc and Howard on two other lists.
There's no reason why it wouldn't work on an Oly.
Hope this helps
Philippe
Le 16 févr. 14 à 15:41, DZDub a écrit :
> Anyone using one of these with an E-thingie? I understand it's the
> bee's
> knees among lenses that cover this range but wonder if there is any
> compromise in using it with a non-Panny, non-Leica body. Can't see
> why,
> but it's a lot of money used and hard to find!
>
> Joel W.
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
One sees clearly only with the heart. What is essential is invisible
to the eye. Antoine de Saint Exupéry in Le Petit Prince.
NO ARCHIVE
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|