My guess is a lens that can be handheld and affordable by most. Certainly
the technology is there to make it f- whatever, however with small bodies
why would you want an expensive set of weights in you camera bag. I have
had had both the Olympus 300mm 4.5 and the 400mm f6.3, both of which were
pretty easy to work with. Each were replaced by the Tamron SP adaptall
lenses that were at f2.8 on the 300mm and f4 on the 400mm. Great lenses and
heavy as heck. Although both have been used handheld, 99% of the time they are
on a tripod. Fast long glass means a heavy lens. Don't think Olympus has
pitched its tent in the heavy camp. Bill Barber
In a message dated 2/12/2014 11:36:50 P.M. Central Standard Time,
mak@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
? 300 f2.8. 250 f2.0. F4? Ick
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|