On 2/5/2014 11:31 AM, Bill Pearce wrote:
> Mike,
> I have the Panasonic 7-14 mft. I have no problems with it except the price.
> I considered the Panasonic and the Oly equivalent, and the only advantages
> of the oly are price and ability to take a filter
Different strokes ... The Panny is twice the weight and 2.5 times the volume of
the Oly. For me, that's the difference
between going in the bag and not. The Oly is amazingly small and light. Yes, it
gets longer in use, but it's space in
the bag that matters to me.
I'd rather have a 7-14, but a lens in the bag is worth so much more than one at
home on the shelf.
> ... I referred to the Thom Hogan website and he seems to favor the Panasonic,
> and I don't
> think he's an internet troll.
I think he's legit. He may not agree with one's own experience on occasion, but
the differences will be honest. I
suspect they are the same in IQ in practical use.
S.W.A. Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|