Subject: | Re: [OM] Errrrr.... nevermind |
---|---|
From: | Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:23:38 -0800 |
> I am looking at either the 14mm/2.5 Panny or the 17mm or the 12mm/2.0 DZ. The dedicated wide converter is said to be very good and still under your total budget. Turns it into a 10~11mm I think. I'm looking for a small zoom to replace the big 9~18 + adapter on my EM5 and I looked at that combo. However I would sacrifice some quality with the micro 9~18. The micro 7~14's defeat the smaller size requirement and reputedly aren't in the same league as their big cousin. I had hoped to sell the 9~18 to help finance a micro wide so going the route of prime + adapter defeats that option. Of course I could then sell the 20mm as a duplicate but couldn't realized much from that sale. I'll be interested in hearing how the little lens works out. Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] ()M) A question of ethics, Andrew Fildes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Errrrr.... nevermind, Bill Pearce |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Errrrr.... nevermind, Bill Pearce |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Errrrr.... nevermind, Frank |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |