>> Having messed around with my late relative's Mrk II I think it is no
> better than the classic 5D unless you need 1) double the pretzils 2) LV,
> 3) bigger monitor, and 4) snobbery/workplace image. The main reason is
> that there is no better linearity of exposure with OM glass. If there had
> been some improvement there (and why would there be? what was I
> thinking?), I would be all over it. I do like the LCD, but I really don't
> need anything other than a histogram on the LCD. The adapter and Joel's
> eyeball generally get the focus where we wants it.
My reasoning is very specific and unique to me. The 5Dmk1 is
problematic with my wrist.
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|