On 1/8/2014 3:53 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>> No no, not the strap (and yes that's a crazy price). But the lens and
>> lens-cap are what caught my eye!
> Oh! I missed that. Can't quite tell for sure, but that looks like a
> 135/2.8 to me.
(O)M-1, for sure. Lens looks like a 135/3.5 to me. The '3.5' next to '5.6' is
the giveaway.
Still, mine does not have the knurling at the back of the slide out hood. Mine
is black-nosed, so maybe the earlier ones
had that. Yeah, found some on Google images, black nose sans knurling, AG
snouts with.
Couldn't be anything else, I think. "AUTO-T" means tele, and that's the only
f3.5-22 tele.
Precisely OM-oose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|