Thanks, Jim. Based on the outward position of the wing pods
(containing fuel, hydrolics and motors, I assume), I'm leaning towards
an Airbus A319 or A320. Given how popular they are in this country
(HEY Frontier, Northwest, etc., you're American companies, ever hear
of Boeing? Another American company? Idiots)... Anyway, as I was
saying, as popular as they are, it's a safe bet.
Oh, BTW, what's with the artifacts in the picture? Is that a trait of
the sensor in that camera? I've never seen artifacts like that before.
AG (I REALLY hate the A319) Schnozz
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks, Ken. My eyes are still in limbo, but that is what I see, as well.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
> On 12/30/2013 9:55 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
>>> If it's a twin jet, the engines are mounted on the tailcone, and that pretty
>>> much limits us to a DC9 or derivative, and that ain't big.
>> If you zoom in on the image, I believe it shows wing mounted engines.
>> At least there are two bright nacelles, either side of the fusalage
>> ahead of the wing. You can also just make out two or three pods on
>> each wing with the 737 and A319 have. Both of those planes (along with
>> the a320) look like wide-body planes from this distance.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|