Neither of them comes close to out doing the lady who emerged from the sea
in a white bikini !
jh
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] IMG: High Altitude Jet
It’s good performance from the camera, I suppose, Jim. And isn’t it great
that we have this sort of discussion?
Off to bed now. I’ve just watched Quantum of Solace and fallen in love with
Gemma Arterton and Olga Kurylenko :-)
I might buy a X-Pro1 tomorrow . . .
Chris
On 30 Dec 2013, at 21:52, Jim Nichols <jhnichols@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think you are correct. Directly behind the aircraft, the contrails
> definitely line up with the engine pods. The third line seems to drift
> from the left to the right, and I can't offer a reason for that.
>
> My impression is that is was a wide-body twin-jet. At six miles away, I
> was just surprised that I got this much detail.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|