Thanks, Moose, for making me look. Yes, the flash (small one that comes with
the camera) was set at -0.3, not the exposure. I will repost a new version so
the list can see what the M-1 can do on its' own. Just got it, and it will
take a while to get used to the menus. But, I'm happy I got it.
----- Original Message -----From: Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>To: Olympus Camera
Discussion <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Sent: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 20:58:01 -0000
(UTC)Subject: Re: [OM] Hi, grandpa.
On 12/12/2013 7:20 AM, Don Holbrook wrote:> Thanks, Philippe. Playing around
with the camera.......white foam was the only thing handy, and I noticed I had
exposure set to minus point 3........but deer season is in, so off to camp.
EV of -0.3 doesn't seem enough to explain such underexposure. Metering was set
for Multi-Segment, Oly's current name for what they originally called ESP
metering, on the OMPC. It's usually not fooled by this sort of subject.
Also, EXIF says flash was used. Flash has its own, separate EV setting. I can't
see what it was in the EXIF. Neither EXIFtool nor Viewer 3 seems to be able to
'see' all the camera settings, so I don't know. But is it possible that Flash
exposure compensation was set lower?
Hidden Data Moose
-- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?--
_________________________________________________________________Options:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympusArchives:
http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/Themed Olympus Photo
Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|