Ah yes, of course - applying tne inverse square law, the extra
.37007874015748 inches might equate to a suitable fraction of a stop's
worth of illumination.
Piers
On 14 Dec 2013 11:34, "Chuck Norcutt" <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'll try it from 39.37007874015748 inches instead. :-)
>
> Dr. (precision) Flash
>
>
>
> On 12/14/2013 5:53 AM, Piers Hemy wrote:
> > My thoughts exactly, except that I think a meter would be more useful.
> > Perhaps placed 39 inches from the flashgun!
> >
> > Piers
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chris Barker [mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 14 December 2013 10:19
> > To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [OM] Dr. Flash asks a flash question
> >
> > Interesting idea, Philippe.
> >
> > Chuck, why not experiment with different amounts of attenuation,
> assessing
> > the result with a flash metre?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > On 14 Dec 13, at 08:51, philippe.amard@xxxxxx wrote:
> >
> >> Thought of using a sieve
> >>
> >>
> >> Kitchen Aid Philippe
> >
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|