Subject: | Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ? |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:49:07 -0800 |
On 12/11/2013 6:03 AM, Piers Hemy wrote: > Many thanks for your clear rationalisation, Moose. > > Well up to expectations (as to presentation as much as > conclusions/recommendations). Thanks! Bob's follow-on is nicely done, too, I think. Zed Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Why I still shoot film, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Does software choice matter in producing image "quality" ?, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |