Subject: | Re: [OM] Shutter shock, VF lag, E-M1 vs. E-M5? |
---|---|
From: | Frank Wijsmuller <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Dec 2013 11:55:13 +0100 |
Hmm.. it represents big steps forward too, but you are right that it is no free lunch. I see your conclusion from a street photography point of view, but there are (many) forms of photography where the benefits might outweigh the costs. I have no first hand experience, but isn't this optical viewfinder of the Fuji not limited to two focal lengths? Isn't that reducing its benefits to lenses with FL's close to those? Not even mentioning the zooms? For the tennis fans around here with an e-m5: you did activate the e-m5's higher EVF refresh rate? I think that should give a bigger chance to get a ball in your pictures ;-). Best, Frank 2013/12/4 Nathan Wajsman <photo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > This is why the move to electronic viewfinders is a big step backwards for > photography. I will never buy a camera that does not have a decent optical > viewfinder. The hybrid implementation in the Fuji X-Pro 1 is the best of > both worlds: EVF for macro, optical for everything else. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] New Years' Day project?, SwissPace |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Can anyone help me with current pricing for the 250mm f2 Zuiko lens?, John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Shutter shock, VF lag, E-M1 vs. E-M5?, Nathan Wajsman |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Shutter shock, VF lag, E-M1 vs. E-M5?, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |