Subject: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1 |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:25:29 -0700 |
> Have you considered how you will process those humongous files? When I > first opened an X-E1 RAW file, using my elderly PC running XP, I > couldn't believe how long it took the computer to load the file. And > that is only 16mp. I suspect my next purchase will be a new computer, > not camera. :-( I actually have a pretty new computer with several gobs of power. I recognize that will be a little bit of an issue, but it's also the case with my film scans. Over the past few years, I've gotten to the point where I shoot mostly RAW+JPEG and only touch the RAW files when needed. -- Ken Norton ken@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.zone-10.com -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Sonie A7r, was OM-D, Frank Wijsmuller |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sonie A7r, was OM-D, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM-D E-M1, Iwert Bernakiewicz |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |