Well I'm glad to hear that no lens did that.
Chuck Norcutt
On 10/8/2013 7:41 AM, Brian Swale wrote:
> Chuck wrote:
>> That's a lot of distortion. Would that have been corrected as a JPEG on
>> a Panasonic body? I just tried correcting 8959 using PTLens Lumix G
>> 14/2.5 raw and JPEG profiles. Must not be the right lens as the raw
>> profile seems to make a mash of it and the JPEG profile alters it but not
>> significantly.
>
> Not that simple, Chuck. PT lens doesn't work at all well at fixing
> non-vertical uprights,
> non-level floors, diamonded doorways and windows where the basic problem is
> with the
> houses being built on a swamp for many centuries ... Worse than the biblical
> houses built on
> sand ..
>
> I suspect they did better in Venice where thousands of tree-trunks were used
> as piles. But
> they didn't have even swamp to start with, I suspect. Just shallow water. And
> mosquitoes.
>
> Very nice photos, by the way, Frank.
>
> Brian Swale
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|