Chuck wrote:
> That's a lot of distortion. Would that have been corrected as a JPEG on
> a Panasonic body? I just tried correcting 8959 using PTLens Lumix G
> 14/2.5 raw and JPEG profiles. Must not be the right lens as the raw
> profile seems to make a mash of it and the JPEG profile alters it but not
> significantly.
Not that simple, Chuck. PT lens doesn't work at all well at fixing non-vertical
uprights,
non-level floors, diamonded doorways and windows where the basic problem is
with the
houses being built on a swamp for many centuries ... Worse than the biblical
houses built on
sand ..
I suspect they did better in Venice where thousands of tree-trunks were used as
piles. But
they didn't have even swamp to start with, I suspect. Just shallow water. And
mosquitoes.
Very nice photos, by the way, Frank.
Brian Swale
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|