On 9/26/2013 1:22 PM, Ken Norton wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Just a random drive-by thought...
>
> The 100/2.8 is likely a near ideal lens for your application, but
> another to seriously consider is the 135/2.8. The extra reach may be
> just what the doctor ordered.
If I recall correctly, Moose made this suggestion early on in this topic of a
lens for Paul in a dark theater.
Why yes, you're right, almost a month ago, he said:
"The 135/2.8 doesn't get a lot of notice, but it's a nice, relatively light,
compact lens ..."
Prescient Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|