Paul,
Just a random drive-by thought...
The 100/2.8 is likely a near ideal lens for your application, but
another to seriously consider is the 135/2.8. The extra reach may be
just what the doctor ordered.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Paul Braun <pbraun42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:51 AM, <NSURIT@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Paul, you might also post a WTB ad on this list in addition to the
>> discussion. Bill Barber
>>
>>
> Well, there's a thought.... :-)
> --
>
> Paul Braun
> Music Junkie
>
> "Music washes from the soul the dust of everyday life." -- Harlan Howard
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|