On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:36 AM, Brian Swale <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However, there is one aspect of macro lenses which I tried to illustrate
> with my little
> set of equipment shots and resultant photos a couple of weeks ago.
>
> That is the different perspectives of the subject which different focal
> lengths provide.
> We might tend to think of perspective as a function of focal length with
> non-macro
> lenses, and ignore this regarding macro, but the same principle applies to
> macro.
>
I am sure that is why different perspective macro lenses exist, and I have
the experience that there is a difference such that I prefer longer macros,
but I could never quantify that experience in any way. Perhaps that's
because I also can't look at a subject and say, "Now that is going to be
much better if I use x macro lens." I tend to compose by looking through
the lens anyway, so I've already bought into the perspective.
In a practical sense, it doesn't really matter to me which macro is at
hand, but I know that I will handhold a 50 better than a 90 or certainly
than the 135. But if I have a tripod at hand, bring on the long ones.
(Make certain to bring the QR plates, eh Ken? Beat you to it!)
Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|