> Although it seems I'm the only one who took notice it was only because
> the result was really good. I personally have no interest in the lens
> no matter how good it is primarily since I do very little macro and
> can't justify the money for it when I have workable alternatives... the
> OMZ 50/3.5 and the Vivitar Series 1 90/2.5 with 1:1 converter. Just to
> show how little macro I do I haven't even tried to fit one of these to
> my E-M5 yet let alone use them. Neither have I tried to use my auto
> extension tubes. But I'll get there eventually.
My favorite "macro lens" through the years has actually been the lowly
50/1.4 with extension tubes. It ain't flat, and it ain't perfect, but
I just love the unique signature.
--
Ken Norton
ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.zone-10.com
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|