To get flash sync with the 3Ti up to 1/2000th you had to use the F280
flash, which had limited flexibility.
___________________________________
John Hermanson | CPS, Inc.
21 South Ln., Huntington NY 11743
www.zuiko.com | omtech1@xxxxxxxxxxx
Olympus OM Service since 1977
On 7/11/2013 3:57 PM, piers@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> Not quite the same camera. Of course, the Titanium panels, and the
> powder coating (?) were different, but inside, the OM-3Ti had flash
> sync. capability in manual mode at any speed from 1 to 1/60 - not
> shared by the OM-3.
>
> And for the pernickety, the strap supplied with the OM-3Ti was
> leather, unlike any other OM camera!
>
> Piers
>
> On 7/11/13, Mark Kronquist <mak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> It was the exact same camera
>> On Jul 11, 2013, at 12:37 PM, Vick Ko wrote:
>>
>>> Another more subtle question - OM3 vs OM3TI?
>>>
>>> The OM3TI was built during the final years of the OM reign. Was it
>>> assembled to a higher quality level?
>>>
>>> And the infamous "battery drain PCB" was resolved by the time the OM3TI
>>> run was done.
>>>
>>> But the rest of the camera, was the OM3TI a better camera than the OM3?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Vick
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________________
>>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>>
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|