Eh? No apologies required for that one. Looks just right to me.
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/27/2013 3:10 PM, Jim Nichols wrote:
> Moose,
>
> I went back to the RAW file and reprocessed the Rose of Sharon image, keeping
> your comments in mind. With the backlighted flower, it was difficult to get
> enough surface lighting without blowing the brighter areas. I worked the
> best compromise I could, without resorting to masking, layers, etc. I have
> replaced the original image with the new one. The link is the same.
>
> http://zone-10.com/tope2/main.php?g2_itemId=6315
>
> It has richer tones, but is pretty dark.
>
> Jim Nichols
> Tullahoma, TN USA
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|