Subject: | Re: [OM] E-M5 report |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:12:04 -0700 |
On 6/25/2013 9:41 AM, Mike Lazzari wrote: > The 12-60 is too big to tempt me to mount on the EM5 but the 9-18 is > perfectly usable. Maybe not as tiny as the m9-18 but I'll save my pesos. One blessing of starting clean with µ4/3. :-) I don't need the 9-18 all that often, but it was invaluable with the giant sequoias last week, and is useful in tight spots. A 7-14 would be even nicer. W.A. Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] E-M5 report, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Hmm, bought a new PC !, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 report, Mike Lazzari |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] E-M5 report, Ian Manners |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |