On 6/11/2013 8:56 AM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
>> It's not a matter of size. As Adobe and others explain it, the problem is
>> that both Windoze and PS are trying to use the
>> same disk for their caches at the same time, and they run into each other.
>> I think this is certainly true with HDs.
>>
>> How much the faster seek and R/W times of SSDs will alleviate this, I
>> don't know.
>>
> The access time of normal hard disk is very slow, in the range 5-10ms (the
> actual random seek time is much more than that). While the SSD can handle
> ~100K IOPS, it is 0.01ms. Which is much faster than a HD. So I expected
> using a single SSD for both PS and Window would be ok.
I would replace 'expect' with 'assume'. I do so in order to bring out an old,
and annoying, saying in English:
"When you assume, you make an 'ass' out of 'u' and 'me'"
I think it possible that an SSD would avoid the problem. Absent proof, I will
not expect/assume it to be so.
Skeptic Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|