----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> On 6/10/2013 6:22 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
>> I'm with you, if the SSD is large enough it can hold both OS and
>> cache/temp
>> files at the same time, no second SSD required.
>
> It's not a matter of size. As Adobe and others explain it, the problem is
> that both Windoze and PS are trying to use the
> same disk for their caches at the same time, and they run into each other.
> I think this is certainly true with HDs.
>
> How much the faster seek and R/W times of SSDs will alleviate this, I
> don't know.
>
The access time of normal hard disk is very slow, in the range 5-10ms (the
actual random seek time is much more than that). While the SSD can handle
~100K IOPS, it is 0.01ms. Which is much faster than a HD. So I expected
using a single SSD for both PS and Window would be ok.
C.H.Ling
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|