Thanks, Paul, I know all of this. But I also know the people. They
would never consider buying something like this and even if they did
would be unlikely to learn to use it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 6/10/2013 2:39 PM, Paul Laughlin wrote:
> Actually, Chuck, they already have a computer, of sorts. That camera is
> essentially a computer. Anything that will display digital images would
> be a computer.
> I would suggest a netbook with as simple as possible of a viewing
> program to display the images. With that many images, it looks to be
> necessary to sort them into galleries or folders and it might be best to
> use a separate program to take care of that. ACDsee Free would probably
> work for the display part. Something like Systweak Photo Album might
> take care of the organizing. Just trying t keep it simple. LOL
> Anything needs the capability of handling the SD card.
> A tablet might be possible, if it does not require syncing to a
> computer. Just stay away from the iPad. It does a lousy job of
> handling images, as far as I am concerned. And I do have one. The
> display is great, but sorting and selecting them sucks. And they are a
> bit expensive.
>
> ___________________________
>>
>> I know one couple in their early 90s who have a digital camera and one
>> SD card that contains about 750 images spanning about 2 or 3 years of
>> photo taking. They do not have a computer. The only way they see their
>> pictures is to scroll through them on the camera. Now, at 750 images,
>> it has become extremely inconvenient to view them. They want to know
>> how to organize them and display them more efficiently. But they don't
>> want a computer and say they can't learn to use one. What do I tell
>> them. :-)
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|