On 6/8/2013 11:17 AM, Chris Barker wrote:
> I think that it's closer to 32mm, Moose. I've been trusting that it's a 1.5
> factor. The X100's 23mm is supposed to be closer to 35mm equivalent.
I did no calculations. I went with the EXIF. Click "Show Details", above the
image, then "Info". There it says "Focal
Length:14mm (21mm in 35mm)"
Fool that I am, I assumed that either Fuji or Nathan put it there, and had
calculated correctly.
Pulling out his handy dandy spreadsheet for AOVs, The Moose found that 21 mm on
a 24x36 mm chemical or electronic sensor
gives a diagonal AOV of 81.2°, while 14 mm on Fuji's 15.8x23.6 mm sensor gives
80.3°.
Given normal manufacturing tolerances, that 1.2% difference is insignificant.
Thus, he feels vindicated in going with
the EXIF. :-)
RTFEXIF Moose
--
What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about?
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|