Subject: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 7/6/2013: two señoritas and two lenses, decades apart |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 8 Jun 2013 19:17:18 +0100 |
I think that it's closer to 32mm, Moose. I've been trusting that it's a 1.5 factor. The X100's 23mm is supposed to be closer to 35mm equivalent. Chris On 8 Jun 2013, at 09:21, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6/8/2013 1:06 AM, Wayne Harridge wrote: >> 14mm on what sized sensor ? > > APS-C, 21 mm eq. on 35 mm. > > Two Thirds Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 22: testing / the X-Pro 1 lands in Alicante, Chris Barker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] (OT) X-100s, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 7/6/2013: two señoritas and two lenses, decades apart, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Nathan's PAD 7/6/2013: two señoritas and two lenses, decades apart, Nathan Wajsman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |