Subject: | Re: [OM] God bless the USA |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 13 May 2013 07:45:27 -0400 |
Ah, but we need the 1776 version. :-) Chuck Norcutt On 5/13/2013 7:40 AM, John D O'Regan wrote: > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/unalienable seems to say that the words are > more or less interchangeable; so does Webster's Third New International > Dictionary (1960) which gives inalienable as one of the meanings of > unalienable, but not vice-versa > John > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Whitmire [mailto:bwhitmire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Patriotic Language Police stepping in: UN-alienable rights. Not > IN-alienable. > > --Bob "TJ" Whitmire > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] God bless the USA, John D O'Regan |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] God bless the USA, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] God bless the USA, John D O'Regan |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] God bless the USA, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |