I don't understand "You only need to file the rear ring down if you want
infinity wide open." It's my understanding that the reason for filing
the rear ring down is to make clearance for the 5D's oversized mirror
when the lens is at infinity. I don't see how "wide open" has anything
to do with it.
Chuck Norcutt
On 5/3/2013 10:19 AM, Sawyer, Edward wrote:
> There's plenty of good info on conversions online. The conversion is fully
> reversible on EOS. Jim Buchanan (on FredMiranda.com) makes a nice
> replacement mount that is super quick to put on , and well made. Nothing
> needs to be irreversibly modified unless using some of the hack-job
> conversion methods (cogitech's method for example).
>
> You only need to file the rear ring down if you want infinity wide open.
> Otherwise, just shoot it as-is. Infinity is not where this lens is best at
> anyway, it's more interesting at portrait distances.
>
> 2x crop factor will be rather lacking, I wouldn't expect to see the "wow"
> from this lens unless used full-frame.
>
> Wide-open it's the best f/1.2 lens in the corners that Modern Photography
> ever tested, from what I recall.
>
> On 5/3/13 1:29 AM, "olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
> <olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I just reviewed the conversion instructions which I got from somewhere
>> (you?) and stashed on my hard drive. I'm afraid I just can't bring
>> myself to do the irreversible surgery on the lens and especially the
>> filing of the rear element retaining ring needed for clearance of the
>> 5D's mirror.
>>
>> It'll just have to content itself on the E-M5. But it's tempting. The
>> bokeh on that lens is awfully nice as I see from the sample shots. :-)
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|