More than happy to give you what you paid for it! :-)
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com
Author/Publisher: The SLR Compendium - http://www.blurb.com/books/3732813
On 04/05/2013, at 12:45 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> Thanks. I guess I'd seen that before but forgotten about it. It's
> definitely a better choice than without the adapter. But I've gone more
> than 50 years of photography without a 58/1.2. I think my 50/1.4 is
> probably adequate but I almost never use it. Maybe I should just sell
> the 58/1.2 to someone who thinks they need it.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> On 5/2/2013 7:51 PM, usher99@xxxxxxx wrote:
>> A very nifty 50. I have always wanted to try one despite having more
>> 50's than I can shake a stick at. One can non-destructively convert
>> with a Leitax kit but IIRC still requires the
>> shaving the rear element retaining ring---does not render the lens
>> non-functional on Minolta by any means.
>> Don't lose any pieces though. Nice rendering/color/bokeh. One version
>> (?ver3) may have a slightly better coating, though have not read
>> anything about that recently and would independently confirm or refute
>> that.
>>
>>
>>
>> http://leitax.com/Rokkor-lens-for-Canon-cameras.html
>>
>> Beaucoup bokeh fan Mike
>>
>>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|