Ken,
If you like the 100/2, the 50/2 is in the same game. A late 1.4 is
very good as well, but not that good at close focussing distance.
I just tested my 28/2 (I believe it comes from Bill?) and could
replicate the issue, but only in very limited situations, and not very
pronounced. (it would only disturb me if I was shooting candles or
lights, and even then it is not that clear, rather faint.
When stopping down it becomes more pronounced however. I have to have
the light in the 'spot metering' area of say the 2-4 screen, otherwise
it does not show. Not in the thirds... probably a crop thing. So for
most compositions it would be a non issue I think.
Haven't tested with a X-mass tree however...
Iwert
2013/3/20 Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> I'ld replace the 50/1.8 with the 50/2 (money no object), it doubles as
>> a macro and is only a tad slower.
>
> ARGH! I meant to type 50/1.4. The 50/1.8 is OK, but not nearly as nice.
>
>
>> Do you have some samples of the hot-spotting of the 28/2. I didn't
>> encounter it on the 5D, but could test it... Focussing on the EG-s
>> screen is rather ok.
>
> It's easy to test. Do an indoor shoot where you place some interior
> lights, like a chandelier, in the thirds, or just off center. See if
> you get the phantom lights showing up on the opposite side of the
> image.
>
> --
> Ken Norton
> ken@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.zone-10.com
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|