On 22/02/2013 17:35, Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I agree and am quite happy to accept your correction... provided that
> you will agree that the unknown component may be zero or close to it.
>
I don't expect anyone to do the follow-up on this, but for me the
fundamental error is in regarding the earth's atmosphere as essentially
a closed system whose external influences are limited to the heat
radiation of the sun.
This is, since the advent of the space age, demonstrably untrue. Every
probe that has left the planet equipped with sensors, wherever it has
gone, has detected 'rains' of charged particles, often in 'ropes',
'stringy things' or 'flux tubes'. They will call these anything but what
they are; electric currents. Why?
Because astronomers and astrophysicists are totally untrained in
electrical phenomena. They talk of gas at millions of degrees, but at
millions of degrees electrons are stripped from the atoms and the 'gas'
becomes ionised; a plasma. Plasmas are unknown territory for astronomers
and astrophysicists.
And for mathematicians, because plasma phenomena do not model elegantly
using the mathematics with which these scientists are familiar.
Thus the astrophysicists and astronomers have misled the 'climate
scientists', and the geologists also, by feeding them a false model of
the universe. The models they build cannot be correct, because they
ignore the single greatest influene on gross atmospheric features;
electricity.
We exist in a plasma soup, an interconnected electrical whole, whose
origin we cannot know and whose extent is likely infinite. The Big Bang
is a myth, disproved forty years ago by Halton Arp, who for his pains
lost his telescope time at Palomar and had his articles rejected in peer
reviewed journals.
Astrophysics is not a science, it is a religion. It is about belief,
dominated by mathematicians who have never done an experiment and who
have never seen a plasma in a lab.
I have a long history in practical conservation, and I'm agin polluting
the atmosphere with sulphur from coal and other nasties. But when I
worked for Big Oil (BP) one of the obscure lines of research was into
abiotic oil, that is oil that is not a 'fossil' fuel. The fact that
aromatic hydrocarbons have been detected in space means that either oil
is not necessarily a 'fossil fuel' or those dinosaurs got pretty far in
their space programme.
A good place to start is Don Scott's Electric Sun, book and website.
Sorry for the OT rant, but occasionally being called a 'denier' and a
shill for big business pisses this revolutionary socialist off!
D.
--
http://www.skelpitheid.com/index.php
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|