Never heard of it. It shall be easy to avoid.
Chuck Norcutt
On 2/22/2013 9:18 AM, Chris Trask wrote:
> <RANT>
>
> I very rarely find fault with the photography in movies, but this one
> is an exception. I finally went to see "Flight" the other day. Good
> story, good acting, and some interesting aerobatics with a DC-9.
>
> But there were places where the photography was awful. At one point,
> the focus of the camera shifted rapidly from the actor's face to some
> point immediately behind him, then in front, the behind, then back to
> where it should have been all along. It wasn't the fault of the
> projectionist, but instead it was the cameraman, and the editing room
> should have caught that.
>
> The worst photography had to do with two scenes that were filmed with
> two of the actors sitting on a porch. The entire porch is in shadow,
> so everything there is in diminished lighting so that details are not
> readily discernible. At the same time, the background outside of the
> porch and in full daylight is terribly washed out. A little bit of
> supplemental lighting on the porch would have corrected that, and
> whoever was responsible for that omission should be kept away from
> making movies entirely.
>
> </RANT>
>
>
> Chris
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|